Debian Med Project
Help us to see Debian used by medical practitioners and biomedical researchers! Join us on the Salsa page.
Summary
Bugs of task bio-phylogeny
Total bugs: 14
Open bugs: 14
Fixed bugs: 0
Links to other tasks
Biology 297 (2635)
Biology development 142 (1237)
Phylogeny 14 (180)
Cloud 66 (681)
Covid-19 195 (1857)
Medical data 0 (0)
Dental 2 (12)
Epidemiology 18 (204)
Imaging 204 (843)
Laboratory 1 (9)
Oncology 1 (3)
Pharmacology 1 (9)
Physics 24 (159)
Practice 6 (45)
Psychology 11 (133)
Research 0 (0)
Statistics 4 (16)
Tools 35 (227)
Typesetting 80 (623)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 3 0
important 5 0
normal 1 0
minor 2 0
wishlist 3 0

Summary bugs page of task Phylogeny

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (180)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

3 serious, 5 important, 1 normal, 2 minor, 3 wishlist
1067631 src:altree: autopkgtest timeouts on armel, armhf and ppc64el
1096300 altree: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, sid
1102872 altree: add perl-xs-dev to Build-Depends
1025424 beast-mcmc: please enable autopkgtest help
1103836 Depends on an EOLed version of libitext
1103312 hmmer: FTBFS with the nocheck build profile ftbfs, sid, trixie
1096850 iqtree: ftbfs with GCC-15 forky, sid
1095078 jmodeltest: reduce the permissions on /var/log/jmodeltest
1099239 jmodeltest: FTBFS: rc/main/java/es/uvigo/darwin/jmodeltest/io/HtmlReporter.java:38: error: cannot find symbol ftbfs, sid, trixie
1105460 muscle: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: Fatal error: can't create Linux/usage.o: No such file or directory ftbfs, sid, trixie
1074546 FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Uses C functions without caml_ prefix) ftbfs
1093109 pplacer: FTBFS with OCaml 5.3.0 (error in C stubs) ftbfs
956848 t-coffee: should use "example" blastpgp.pl
846481 src:treeviewx: Please remove statically linked code copy of libncl

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Thu, 15 May 2025 18:19:23 -0000