Debian Med Project
Help us to see Debian used by medical practitioners and biomedical researchers! Join us on the Salsa page.
Summary
Bugs of task bio-ngs
Total bugs: 12
Open bugs: 8
Fixed bugs: 4
Links to other tasks
Biology 287 (2532)
Biology development 136 (1184)
Phylogeny 7 (54)
Cloud 46 (504)
Covid-19 180 (1800)
Medical data 2 (10)
Dental 2 (12)
Epidemiology 11 (102)
Imaging 198 (826)
Laboratory 1 (9)
Oncology 1 (3)
Pharmacology 1 (9)
Physics 27 (192)
Practice 8 (51)
Psychology 12 (121)
Research 0 (0)
Statistics 4 (16)
Tools 39 (240)
Typesetting 68 (543)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 1 0
important 1 0
normal 4 1
minor 1 0
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Next generation sequencing

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (87)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 serious, 1 important, 4 normal, 1 minor
1067374 blasr: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../extrautils/StoreQualityByContextFromCmpH5.cpp:40: multiple definition of `main'; toAfg.p/utils_ToAfg.cpp.o:./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/../utils/ToAfg.cpp:30: first defined here ftbfs, sid, trixie
1048396 last-align: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1073098 math-numeric-tower-clojure: build-depends on markdown pending
1074044 libvcflib: Improve support for loongarch64 patch, pending
1087456 samtools: autopkgtest regression with htslib 1.21
1084404 sra-sdk: move from fuse to fuse3
1087096 sra-sdk: Python SyntaxWarning

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 normal
1075928 python-anndata: tests fail with scipy 1.13

Done bugs

1086364 metabat: FTBFS: Package 'bzip2', required by 'htslib', not found ftbfs, sid, trixie
1086367 libhts-dev: Missing dependency on libbz2-dev ftbfs
1086368 libhts-dev: Missing dependency on libbz2-dev ftbfs
1040391 sra-toolkit: broken symlink: /usr/lib/debian-med/bin/kget -> ../../../bin/vdb-get
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:19:11 -0000