Debian Science Project
Summary
Bugs of task workflow
Total bugs: 29
Open bugs: 26
Fixed bugs: 3
Links to other tasks
Tasks overview
Biology 14 (211)
Chemistry 83 (867)
Data acquisition 56 (238)
Data management 53 (501)
Devices 7 (93)
Economics 31 (144)
Engineering 82 (782)
Engineering-dev 40 (421)
Geography 75 (523)
Geometry 4 (21)
Linguistics 94 (380)
Logic 41 (297)
Machine learning 61 (606)
Mathematics 250 (2069)
Mathematics-dev 159 (1548)
Meteorology 91 (635)
Meteorology-dev 208 (965)
Nanoscale physics 330 (2487)
Physics 84 (837)
Physics-dev 31 (293)
Presentation 87 (720)
Psychophysics 17 (174)
Robotics 119 (478)
Robotics-dev 18 (147)
Simulations 36 (370)
Social 0 (0)
Statistics 55 (395)
Tools 17 (77)
Typesetting 288 (1926)
Viewing 318 (1921)
Viewing-dev 66 (612)
Workflow 26 (197)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 1 0
important 6 1
normal 7 1
minor 2 0
wishlist 8 0

Summary bugs page of task Workflow

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (197)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

1 serious, 6 important, 7 normal, 2 minor, 8 wishlist
cctools (3) Homepage: https://ccl.cse.nd.edu/software/ Vcs Alastair McKinstry
720378 cctools: FTBFS on non-linux
772215 coop-computing-tools: bashism in /bin/sh script
988805 coop-computing-tools-doc: broken documentation symlinks
gearmand (4) Homepage: http://launchpad.net/gearmand Vcs Alexandre Mestiashvili
861325 gearman-job-server "Too many open files" logging
878224 changing gearman-job-server parameters with systemd requires overlay file
1044233 gearmand: Fails to build source after successful build forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
1069031 gearmand contains a broken, oudated, embedded copy of AX_BOOST_BASE security
make-dfsg (13) Homepage: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/ Vcs Stephen Kitt
4073 make pattern rules delete intermediate files upstream
206746 Please add an option to list all dependencies of a target (recursively)
227569 make: debug output should communicate knowledge of phony targets
346248 [regression] make: slow to realize it's unable to build a .SECONDARY target upstream
548890 make: add an better FHS compliant include directory
635646 make: please fall back to system() when command is not found on $PATH upstream
763768 strange behavior of gnu make upstream
774681 make can’t distinguish between mistyped fn name and a variable with spaces upstream
973409 make: doesn't execute recipes with /bin/sh upstream
983115 make -t doesn't correctly touch grouped targets that are built by a recursive make upstream
991229 make: Segmentation error incurred in a call to a template that is mistakenly called infinitely recusively.
1049932 make: Leaves --jobserver-auth for pipe in MAKEFLAGS when invoking command without + upstream
1092051 make-dfsg v4.4 massively slows down dpkg-buildpackage
snakemake (2) Homepage: https://snakemake.readthedocs.io/ Vcs Debian Med Packaging Team
1088534 snakemake: move from twitter-bootstrap{3,4} to bootstrap-html (v5) upstream
1095394 snakemake: tests randomly failing or hanging forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
toil (2) Homepage: https://github.com/BD2KGenomics/toil Vcs Debian Med Packaging Team
1108056 toil: FTBFS: Some tests fail on single-cpu systems forky, ftbfs, help, sid, trixie
1123531 toil: FTBFS: E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pytest_subtests' forky, ftbfs, sid

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 important, 1 normal
benchmark (2) Homepage: https://github.com/google/benchmark Vcs Debian Science Team
881739 benchmark: FTBFS on hurd-i386: clock_gettime(CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID, ...) failed ftbfs, upstream
1093626 benchmark FTBFS on hppa ftbfs

Done bugs

nipype (2) Homepage: https://nipype.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Vcs Debian Med Packaging Team
1105501 nipype: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting forky, ftbfs, sid, trixie
1116270 python3-nipype: recommends python3-cfflib which is not in unstable
snakemake (1) Homepage: https://snakemake.readthedocs.io/ Vcs Debian Med Packaging Team
1124258 snakemake: Unused RC-buggy dependency ratelimiter
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 18:17:50 -0000