Debian Science Project
Summary
Bugs of task biology
Total bugs: 10
Open bugs: 10
Fixed bugs: 0
Links to other tasks
Biology 10 (142)
Chemistry 100 (1053)
Data acquisition 56 (240)
Data management 57 (456)
Devices 17 (174)
Economics 28 (154)
Engineering 89 (953)
Engineering-dev 78 (792)
Geography 97 (710)
Geometry 4 (21)
Linguistics 93 (419)
Logic 39 (306)
Machine learning 40 (313)
Mathematics 255 (2227)
Mathematics-dev 195 (1805)
Meteorology 95 (625)
Meteorology-dev 196 (806)
Nanoscale physics 337 (2724)
Physics 82 (840)
Physics-dev 38 (374)
Presentation 80 (666)
Psychophysics 10 (109)
Robotics 108 (459)
Robotics-dev 36 (378)
Simulations 59 (751)
Social 0 (0)
Statistics 53 (328)
Tools 14 (94)
Typesetting 268 (1767)
Viewing 309 (1933)
Viewing-dev 70 (693)
Workflow 29 (224)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 2 0
serious 1 1
important 0 1
normal 4 0
minor 0 1
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Biology

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (142)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

2 grave, 1 serious, 4 normal
756997 Segfaults on start
757008 Segfaults on start
838137 critterding: FTBFS in experimental: be_command_system.cpp:13:94: error: '_1' was not declared in this scope ftbfs, pending
1009908 critterding build depends on qt4 ftbfs, pending
1038177 critterding: Depends on SDL 1.2 sid, trixie
1083505 nmodl: (build-)depends on deprecated module python3-pkg-resources sid, trixie
1083506 nmodl: (build-)depends on deprecated module python3-pkg-resources sid, trixie

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 serious, 1 important, 1 minor
1020544 siconos: FTBFS on s390x: Cholesky solve kNM_test failed ftbfs
1046177 siconos: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1066316 siconos: FTBFS: lcp_nsqp.c:139:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘numerics_error’; did you mean ‘numerics_EXPORTS’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ftbfs, sid, trixie

Done bugs

*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:19:33 -0000