Debian Science Project
Summary
Bugs of task biology
Total bugs: 10
Open bugs: 10
Fixed bugs: 0
Links to other tasks
Biology 10 (142)
Chemistry 102 (1143)
Data acquisition 55 (235)
Data management 54 (429)
Devices 17 (204)
Economics 31 (223)
Engineering 81 (824)
Engineering-dev 76 (795)
Geography 97 (710)
Geometry 4 (21)
Linguistics 90 (371)
Logic 37 (228)
Machine learning 41 (370)
Mathematics 251 (2143)
Mathematics-dev 172 (1515)
Meteorology 92 (561)
Meteorology-dev 199 (830)
Nanoscale physics 325 (2612)
Physics 87 (924)
Physics-dev 37 (399)
Presentation 81 (648)
Psychophysics 10 (124)
Robotics 106 (452)
Robotics-dev 31 (288)
Simulations 51 (570)
Social 0 (0)
Statistics 52 (335)
Tools 13 (52)
Typesetting 271 (1773)
Viewing 303 (1808)
Viewing-dev 75 (744)
Workflow 27 (194)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 2 0
serious 1 1
important 0 1
normal 4 0
minor 0 1
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Biology

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (142)*

Open bugs in dependent packages

2 grave, 1 serious, 4 normal
756997 Segfaults on start
757008 Segfaults on start
838137 critterding: FTBFS in experimental: be_command_system.cpp:13:94: error: '_1' was not declared in this scope ftbfs, pending
1009908 critterding build depends on qt4 ftbfs, pending
1038177 critterding: Depends on SDL 1.2 sid, trixie
1083505 nmodl: (build-)depends on deprecated module python3-pkg-resources sid, trixie
1083506 nmodl: (build-)depends on deprecated module python3-pkg-resources sid, trixie

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 serious, 1 important, 1 minor
1020544 siconos: FTBFS on s390x: Cholesky solve kNM_test failed ftbfs
1046177 siconos: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1066316 siconos: FTBFS: lcp_nsqp.c:139:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘numerics_error’; did you mean ‘numerics_EXPORTS’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ftbfs, sid, trixie

Done bugs

*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 18:19:39 -0000