Summary

Bugs of task control-systems

Total bugs: 24

Open bugs: 19

Fixed bugs: 5

Links to other tasks

Tasks overview

Coherent-diffraction 0 (0)

Control-systems 19 (186)

Control-systems-dev 19 (186)

Data-reduction-frameworks 276 (2403)

Data-reduction-frameworks-dev 7 (117)

Diffraction 26 (277)

Grazing-incidence 4 (36)

Imaging 236 (1964)

Laue 0 (0)

Machine-learning 18 (134)

Modelling 6 (51)

Mx 84 (673)

Mx-dev 2 (10)

Powder 14 (153)

Small-angle-scattering 16 (192)

Spectroscopy 15 (174)

Tomography 54 (488)

Xas 7 (51)

Legend

Severity	Dependent	Suggested
critical	0	0
grave	0	0
serious	0	0
important	7	0
normal	8	0
minor	3	0
wishlist	1	0

Summary bugs page of task Control-systems

Immediately looking into bugs of the dependencies of this task is advised (186)^*

Open bugs in dependent packages

7 important, 8 normal, 3 minor, 1 wishlist

epics-base (10) Homepage: https://epics-controls.org/ Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
1039087	epic-base: embed yajl
1040159	epics-base: embedded yajl is vulnerable to CVE-2017-16516 and CVE-2022-24795	security, upstream
1042878	FTBFS: on all architectures	fixed-upstream
1068708	Building with EPICS fails because the compiler cannot find `compilerSpecific.h`.
1072148	epics-base: please add support for loong64	patch
1079604	epics-base:FTBFS:build failure (not support riscv64)	ftbfs, patch
1092006	epics-base: procedure to update debian/control
1092462	pkg-config files are broken in epics-dev package
1092604	epics-dev: EPICS development tools missing
1096585	epics-base: ftbfs with GCC-15	forky, sid
hkl (1) Homepage: https://repo.or.cz/hkl.git Vcs Debian PaN Maintainers
1096813	hkl: ftbfs with GCC-15	forky, sid
pytango (1) Homepage: https://pytango.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
1031884	pytango FTBFS on big endian architectures	fixed-upstream, ftbfs
sardana (1) Homepage: https://www.sardana-controls.org Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
1035245	sardana: please add autopkgtests (to add coverage for python3-numpy)
tango (2) Homepage: https://www.tango-controls.org Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
737956	can not install if a non system tango user exists
1048363	tango: Fails to build source after successful build	ftbfs, sid, trixie
taurus (4) Homepage: http://www.taurus-scada.org Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
700228	editing a spectrum of string cause some troubles	fixed-upstream, upstream
729392	segfault when reading an image
739895	python-taurus-doc: ships with duplicates of Tango icons, and icons that could be shared
1047828	taurus: Fails to build source after successful build	ftbfs, sid, trixie

Open bugs in suggested packages

Done bugs

sardana (1) Homepage: https://www.sardana-controls.org Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
1091057	sardana: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python3-pylsp (< 1.11~), python3-qtconsole (< 5.6~), python3-spyder-kernels (< 2.6~)	ftbfs, sid, trixie
tango (1) Homepage: https://www.tango-controls.org Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
1062979	tango-db: the upgraded version of tango-db is not compatible with maria-db from bookworm	moreinfo
taurus (2) Homepage: http://www.taurus-scada.org Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
966053	taurus: Uses old name of sip module
1035270	taurus: please add autopkgtests (to add coverage for python3-numpy)
taurus-pyqtgraph (1) Homepage: https://github.com/taurus-org/taurus_pyqtgraph Vcs Debian Science Maintainers
1091042	taurus-pyqtgraph: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python3-pylsp (< 1.11~), python3-qtconsole (< 5.6~), python3-spyder-kernels (< 2.6~)	ftbfs, sid, trixie

^*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:

critical	10
grave	10
serious	10
important	5
normal	3
minor	1
wishlist	0