Debian GIS Project
Summary
Bugs of task remotesensing
Total bugs: 13
Open bugs: 5
Fixed bugs: 8
Links to other tasks
Data 0 (0)
Development 77 (571)
Gps 97 (649)
Openstreetmap 34 (218)
Statistics 0 (0)
Map server 2 (14)
Workstation 49 (512)
Legend
SeverityDependentSuggested
critical 0 0
grave 0 0
serious 0 0
important 2 1
normal 1 0
minor 1 0
wishlist 0 0

Summary bugs page of task Remote sensing

Consider looking into bugs of this task*

Open bugs in dependent packages

2 important, 1 normal, 1 minor
1050779 coda: Drop unused libnetcdf-dev build dependency patch
1139600 gmtsar: FTBFS against HDF5 2.1.0 ftbfs, patch, pending, upstream
1047423 pyerfa: Fails to build source after successful build ftbfs, sid, trixie
1134248 pyresample: FTBFS with GDAL 3.13.0 ftbfs, upstream

Open bugs in suggested packages

1 important
1123960 netcdf: CVE-2025-14932 CVE-2025-14933 CVE-2025-14934 CVE-2025-14935 CVE-2025-14936 security, upstream

Done bugs

1133807 libcoda-dev fails to coinstall
1134784 libepr-api-dev fails to coinstall
1138650 src:erfa: fails to migrate to testing for too long forky, sid
1135997 gdal: CVE-2026-8084 CVE-2026-8086 CVE-2026-8087 CVE-2026-8088 security, upstream
1137061 gdal-bin: Can gdal-bin be compiled with support for (geo)parquet?
1137148 gdal: Please drop dependencies on virtual packages from mysql-defaults
1135488 stac-check: FTBFS: E importlib.metadata.PackageNotFoundError: No package metadata was found for stac-validator forky, ftbfs, sid
1138617 xarray-sentinel: Fix for broken test that blocks xarray 2026.04.0 transition patch
*To estimate the overall status of the packages in the dependencies of a metapackage a weighted severity is calculated. Done bugs are ignored and bugs in dependent and recommended packages are weighted by factor three compared to suggested packages. Release critical bugs have a much larger weight than important, while the contribution of normal bugs is even smaller and minor bugs have a very small weight. Wishlist bugs are ignored in this calculation. The resulting sum is compared to some boundaries to find a verbal form. The actual numbers need some adjustment to make real sense - this evaluation method is in testing phase.
The severities of bugs are weighted as follows:
critical10
grave10
serious10
important5
normal3
minor1
wishlist0
Last update: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:17:29 -0000